Oppenheimer is a meaningful film but too long and slow to tell the torturous journey of Dr. Robert Oppenheimer, a theoretical physicist who created the Atomic Bomb. In the beginning, caring about Dr. Oppenheimer portrayed excellently by Cillian Murphy is difficult due to the focus on technical scientific terms necessitated because of the topic of quantum physics. I do not enjoy the study of science, but this does not mean I do not honor its importance, so I’m not the best one to care about this topic, but I do care about the man and I would like to have seen more in the beginning about his character. By the end, your heart throbs for Dr. Robert Oppenheimer’s suffering and the role of the government in his attempted demise, but he triumphs if you can sit through the film. Director Christopher Nolan has made the sound a disturbing character. When the bomb created by Dr. Oppenheimer is dropped there is silence, which is not what are expecting. And throughout the film, there are bizarre moments where the sound actually drowns out the dialogue. The cast is aces and star-studded, and for some unknown reason looks older than most of the stars are today. Christopher Nolan does not like to light stars to look good At the beginning of the film Emily Blunt, a great beauty looks quite haggard and the list can go on and on. Matt Damon whose acting is always superb is a bit difficult to look at. Of course, his gain in weight doesn’t help. Kenneth Branagh in a smaller part and Remi Malek almost steal the film, and Robert Downey, Jr., excels in his role as Lewis Strauss, who turns against Dr. Oppenheimer and tries to destroy him due to Dr. Oppenheimer's fears of what he has created with the atomic bomb, and that it could destroy civilization. But I feel that director Nolan, who also wrote the film and has been nominated for five Academy Awards and six Golden Globes misses on this film. He uses black-and-white for the future and sound as a character, and special visual effects when the bomb is dropped therefore throughout the film, I felt manipulated when the real story is about a brilliant man, who cared about civilization and grew to be ambivalent about his creation of the atomic bomb once it was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Robert Downey, Jr., represents the government's, interest in creating the first nuclear weapons as part of the Manhattan Project, When Dr. Oppenheimer regrets the consequences of the possible end of civilization due to his creation of this bomb. Robert Downey, Jr., turns on Dr. Oppenheimer and tries to blacklist him as a communist to destroy his powerful fame and voiced fears about what Dr. Oppenheimer has created. President Truman (Gary Oldman) even says to his secretary after meeting with Dr. Oppenheimer,"Don't let that Sissy back in!" I enjoyed the film, but the length was a problem and the lack of focus on Dr. Oppenheimer's stellar character. It is an important movie due to its subject matter, but unfortunately does not sustain the interest that it should.
The Nutcracker at Philadelphia’s Academy of Music Meets Baryshnikov
Boy, I wanted to see what the Pennsylvania Ballet would do with Balanchine’s choreography of the Nutcracker and the lyrical music of Tchaikovsky’s and recall those days I would frequent the New York City Ballet. Once I was following Misha around when he was about to go on. “You are not allowed on stage, Carole,’ he said as he smiled his pixie grin and danced off to please an eagerly awaiting audience.
But today I was going to see Pennsylvania Ballet founder and Balanchine protégé Barbara Weisberger’s production of the Nutcracker with good friends, Diane and Tom Reed and my sister, Elmira Batson who had studied ballet as a child, Tom and Diane who own Tom’s Pet Outlet had sold me the love of my life, Herbert, my five lb. Maltese.. We were all excited and exchanged stories about when we had last seen this romantic vision where the balletomanes dance trippingly on their toes with children under their wings, in dresses, lying in beds, flying off over a crescent moon at the end and waving goodbye to an awestruck audience.
But would the tree rise from the floor suddenly in the middle of Act One as it had in New York some eighteen years earlier. Or was that just a big city bit. Would it rise and rise and dwarf the sleeping princess and all her friends. Would it? Probably not, I thought.
This was Philadelphia and while I had read excellent reviews, I needed to see if this tree would rise. The opening sparkled as the party the night before the dream was about to happen.
Teary-eyed,I listened to the overture and to the Philadelphia Boys Choir as I recalled my 95 -year -old mother by my side, wheel chair bound, and how cultured she was. Of German descent she taught me to value the arts. Piano lessons, classical music and while she had been a Pennsylvania Deutsch farmer, her appreciation of the fine arts was reminiscent of high German culture.
Misha was always kind to my mother, “How do you do, Mrs. Wagner,” he would say as he shook her hand and feigned a mock but polite curtsy. Misha adored his mother who had committed suicide. Mothers meant a great deal to him
But this was the past and the magic of the Nutcracker is how it evokes fond memories as everyone wonders, “When was the first time I saw the Nutcracker.
But would the tree rise? I still pondered.
Outstanding performances were Amy Aldridge as the Sugarplum Fairy and her Cavalier, Ian Hussey. But it is the professionalism and joy of the many children that tears at your heart as performed by Claire Smith as the Little Princess and Aidan Duffy as the Little Prince.
While seeing the Nutcracker Suite recalls the innocence and naiveté of youth and all its charming trappings, storm clouds often loom on the horizon with age, but a visit to the Academy of Music and its fine production of Tchaikovsky’s score and Balanchine’s images performed through December 31, puts all that sadness to rest and replaces it with fond, joyful memories for celebration of a traditional Christmas Season with one’s remaining family and friends.


